![]() ![]() QLX-D only allows you to control devices within the same network. You have to use ULX-D for that since each building will have its own network. QLX-D can only communicate within the same subnet: one network on one floor.Īn example in the education context: say you have a centrally located control room for all the devices on multiple campuses of a university. What does "across subnets" mean? It means across multiple networks, like if you have two floors each on separate networks. If you want to use that system to control devices across subnets, then you have to use ULX-D. If you have a third-party control device, most likely AMX or Crestron, then you use a console to control projectors, lights, microphones-everything-in your corporate board room, for example. The key differences fall under two categories: network sophistication and RF flexibility. In terms of audio quality, reliability, and RF performance, as we said, they're the same. Thank you for asking this question! This is so critically important. Could you tie specs to applications so that people can better understand which specs are important for their application? Comparing the spec sheets for the two, there are some specs in common and some specs that are different. ![]() Let's dig a little deeper into some of the key features that distinguish QLX-D from ULX-D. Those features are huge for this tier product. In designing QLX-D, we cut the features for large-scale systems while retaining the same audio quality, reliability, and RF performance.Įven though it's streamlined compared to ULX-D, QLX-D has a richer feature set than competitor wireless systems at its price point, including AES-256 encryption, IP networking capabilities, and rechargeable battery technology. If you have multiple floors and each has its own network, or you're dealing with multiple corporate or university campuses, then that's a larger scale operation for which ULX-D is a better solution.įor live music performances in a small- to medium-size concert hall, QLX-D is appropriate, but if you're talking about a live music performance in a huge stadium, then UHF-R® or Axient® are more appropriate solutions because they're designed with larger venues in mind. QLX-D is the right solution for that context. In a corporate context, mid-size would mean that you'd want to use all the receivers on the same floor of a building, and on the same network. ![]() Who should use which system is a question of scale, so that's where the "mid-size venues and installations" designation becomes important. Then again, so is ULX-D® Digital, our higher-tier system. QLX-D is for corporate events, live music performances, higher education, high schools, houses of worship, hotels and conference centers-lots of applications. ![]() So, a two-pronged question: what are mid-sized venues and installations? And, when you have to cut some feature options to keep a system within a price range but without compromising sound quality, how do you decide what to cut? We say that QLX-D is ideal for mid-size events and installations, and for customers who need high-tier quality sound on a smaller budget. QLX-D™ Digital Wireless, our newest digital wireless system, is now available, so I sat down with Mu Yang from the product development team to get a sense of who it is (and isn't) for, and how it compares to some of our other systems. So, the more choices you have, the more confusing things can get. By the same token, if you're shopping for a wireless system, it can be a challenge to figure out how much system you need, and which features are the most important. The Shure wireless catalog is growing, which is great news because it means more options. He discusses who it is (and isn't) for, and how it compares to some of our other systems. Mu Yang, from the product development team, talks about our newest wireless system, QLX-D Digital Wireless. Share this 5 Things To Know About QLX-D Digital Wireless ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |